International Journal of Comparative Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grigel, F.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 3-4, 245-251 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/002071528802900306

Sex Characteristic Stereotypes or Congruence: Do Either Matter Any More to Ratings of Performance?

Frank Grigel

University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Sheldon Goldenberg

University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

The present study examines students' expectations of the teaching abilities of hypothetical university professors in an attempt to assess the effect of gender stereotypes on ratings of occupa tional performance. Undergraduate sociology students were presented with a brief description of a hypothetical professor (either male or female) and then indicated their expectations of his/her teaching abilities on a list of positive and negative teaching attributes. Three possible outcomes were anticipated: the male professor receiving a more positive rating than the female professor; the female professor receiving a more positive rating; or no gender differences in the ratings. Two separate tests were conducted, the second with a revised instrument, and the data were analyzed using ANOVA. Neither the initial test (n = 80), nor the retest (n = 61) resulted in any ratings difference due to the gender of the professors or students. However, caution is necessary in interpreting the results as evidence that students no longer use gender stereotypes as guides for their expectations of teaching performance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?