This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Power, T. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Political Landscapes, Political Parties, and Authoritarianism in Brazil and Chile

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, U.S.A.

Political parties are the central mediating structures between state and society under democratic regimes. Strong party systems are associated with enduring political tendencies in the electorate; weak party systems do not evince this association. In the bureaucratic- authoritarian regimes found in the Southern Cone of Latin America in the 1960s and 1970s, military elites moved against political parties in an attempt to reshape political life in their coun tries. In Brazil, long plagued by weak parties and party systems, authoritarian rulers managed to reconstitute the party system as they wished. In Chile, where parties have historically deep roots in civil society, the Pinochet regime was not able to duplicate the Brazilian feat. Chilean parties are seen as viable regime alternatives. A political party system which penetrates civil society is more likely to survive the suspension and perversion of electoral politics characteristic of authoritarian regimes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Franklin Political Party Opposition to Noncompetitive Regimes: A Cross-National Analysis Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2002; 55(3): 521 - 546. [Abstract] [PDF]