International Journal of Comparative Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unnithan, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Whitt, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 3-4, 182-196 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/002071529203300303
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Inequality, Economic Development and Lethal Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of Suicide and Homicide

N. Prabha Unnithan

Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A.

Hugh P. Whitt

Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0324, U.S.A.

A theoretical tradition predating Durkheim links suicide and homicide as two currents in a single stream of lethal violence. This paper explores the relationships of inequality and economic development to suicide in a sample of 31 nations using both this perspective and the more traditional approach, which treats suicide and homicide separately. Inequality is generally a better predictor than development. After controlling for development, it is curvilinearly related to homicide and to total lethal violence, and it has negative linear effects on suicide and the SMR, a measure of the direction in which violence is directed. Controlling for inequality, development is unrelated to total violence, curvilinearly related to the SMR, and only weakly related to suicide and homicide.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
D. T. Johnson
The Homicide Drop in Postwar Japan
Homicide Studies, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 146 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Sci Jpn ResHome page
D. T. JOHNSON
The Vanishing Killer: Japan's Postwar Homicide Decline
Soc. Sci. Jpn. Res., April 1, 2006; 9(1): 73 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. H. Bond
Culture and Aggression--From Context to Coercion
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 62 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
N. He, L. Cao, W. Wells, and E. R. Maguire
Forces of Production and Direction: A Test of an Expanded Model of Suicide and Homicide
Homicide Studies, February 1, 2003; 7(1): 36 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
De Li
Economic Development, Social Control, and Murder Rates: A Cross-National Approach
Cross-Cultural Research, November 1, 1995; 29(4): 361 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]