This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schou, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Democratic Local Government and Responsiveness: Lessons from Zimbabwe and Tanzania

Based on case studies in Tanzania and Zimbabwe, this article investigates the proposition that democratic local government is coupled with high level of responsiveness. None of the selected councils are particularly responsive. When trying to explain this finding, I draw on both state-centred and society-centred theories of politicid decision-making. It is the state-centred theories that prove to have most explanatory power. Although the character of the social formation differs substantially between the two countries (chieftainship plays a much more prominent role in Zimbabwe), this is not a decisive factor. The argument that the level of popular participation is a key factor in explaining responsiveness is examined in depth. The argument has certain relevance. However, it is argued that the councils' degree of financial autonomy from central government have more significant bearings on responsiveness.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?