International Journal of Comparative Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van de Werfhorst, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 5, 315-335 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0020715204054154

Systems of Educational Specialization and Labor Market Outcomes in Norway, Australia, and The Netherlands

Herman G. van de Werfhorst

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, H.G.vandeWerfhorst{at}uva.nl

To account for differences between systems of education in highly educated societies, I argue that the impact of academic discipline (field of study) on labor market outcomes should be central. Three modifications of earlier typologies are needed to account for cross-national differences in the transparency of skills provided by educational specialization. We should observe: (1) the system of tertiary vocational programs; (2) whether a system has a bachelor’s-master’s structure; and (3) whether students choose minor and major subjects in college. Our analysis of Norway, Australia, and the Netherlands shows that these modifications seem useful. In the Netherlands, the impact of fields of study on wages and occupational status is much higher than in the other countries. The relatively high value of Australian qualifications compared to the Norwegian may be explained by the welfare state regulations of both countries, but this explanation is a tentative one. In Australia, eligibility to social benefits depends much more on previous work experience than in Norway, making fields of study a better indicator of labor market commitment.

Key Words: Australia • cross-national comparison • education • field of study • labor market • Norway • the Netherlands • wages


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
H. G. van de Werfhorst
Educational Fields of Study and European Labor Markets: Introduction to a Special Issue
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 227 - 231.
[PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
D. Reimer, C. Noelke, and A. Kucel
Labor Market Effects of Field of Study in Comparative Perspective: An Analysis of 22 European Countries
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 233 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
L. Ortiz and A. Kucel
Do Fields of Study Matter for Over-education?: The Cases of Spain and Germany
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 305 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
M. Darmody, E. Smyth, and M. Unger
Field of Study and Students' Workload in Higher Education: Ireland and Austria in Comparative Perspective
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 329 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]