International Journal of Comparative Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shin, K.-h.
Right arrow Articles by Timberlake, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 47, No. 2, 145-173 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0020715206065384
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Korea’s Global City

Structural and Political Implications of Seoul’s Ascendance in the Global Urban Hierarchy

Kyoung-ho Shin

Northwest Missouri State University, USA, KSHIN{at}nwmissouri.edu

Michael Timberlake

University of Utah, USA, timber{at}soc.utah.edu

Seoul, South Korea has risen remarkably in the global hierarchy of cities since the mid-1970s, and arguably it is now among an elite group of about 15 of the most globally central cities in the world. While it is increasingly the object of urban studies research, few efforts have specifically focused on linking social structural changes within the city to its increasingly intense participation in the global economy. The globalization and world cities perspective suggests that as cities achieve global prominence, they should experience certain social structural transformations, some of which are problematic, such as increasing polarization and marginalization. But critics of this view argue that the ‘globalizationists’ ignore the role of the state, which, to them, has a more profound influence over urban transformations. This article surveys some of the research and data on Seoul’s recent social transformation and compares these changes to the expectations of the globalization perspective and to the counter-argument that state policies are more important. We also discuss the likelihood that the Korean capital will improve or even maintain its prominence in the world-systems city system.

Key Words: Asian urbanization • mega cities • urbanization • urbanization and development • world cities


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?