This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bértola, L. Articles by Willebald, H. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Income Distribution in the Latin American Southern Cone during the First Globalization Boom and Beyond

Universidad de la República, Uruguay, lbertola{at}fcs.edu.uy

Cecilia Castelnovo

Universidad de la República, Uruguay, ccastelnovo{at}fcs.edu.uy

Javier Rodríguez

Universidad de la República, Uruguay, jerweber{at}fcs.edu.uy

Henry Willebald

Universidad Carlos, Madrid, Spain, hwilleba{at}clio.uc3m.edu

Latin America is the most unequal region in the world and there is intense debate concerning the explanations and timing of such high levels of income inequality. Latin America was also the region, not including European Offshoots, which experienced the most rapid growth during the first globalization boom. It can, therefore, be taken as an interesting case of study regarding how globalization forces impinged on growth and income distribution in peripheral regions. This article presents a first estimate of income inequality in the Southern Cone of South America (Brazil 1872 and 1920, Chile 1870 and 1920, Uruguay 1920) and some assumptions concerning Argentina (1870 and 1920), and Uruguay (1870). We find an increasing trend towards inequality between 1870 and 1920, which can be explained as a process of inequality both within individual countries and among countries. This trend is discussed along three lines: the relationship between inequality and per capita income levels; the dynamics of the expansion to new areas; and movements of relative factor prices and of the terms of trade. During the current globalization process inequality remained apparently stable, as a result of contradictory movements: within-country inequality increased, especially in the three countries with the highest per capita income; on the other hand, between-country inequality was reduced due to the process of club-convergence among the Southern Cone countries. Divergence with core countries was deepened. Some implicit results seem to show that state-led industrialization was featured by decreasing inequality, both within and among countries.

Key Words: first globalization • income distribution • institutions • Latin America’s Southern Cone • regional development

International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 50, No. 5-6, 452-485 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0020715209339883


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?