<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com">
<title>International Journal of Comparative Sociology recent issues</title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com</link>
<description>International Journal of Comparative Sociology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Comparative Sociology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0020-7152</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/4-5/227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/329?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/2-3/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/31?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/60?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/481?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/509?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://cos.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>International Journal of Comparative Sociology</title>
<url>http://cos.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/4-5/227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Educational Fields of Study and European Labor Markets: Introduction to a Special Issue]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/4-5/227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Werfhorst, H. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Educational Fields of Study and European Labor Markets: Introduction to a Special Issue]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Labor Market Effects of Field of Study in Comparative Perspective: An Analysis of 22 European Countries]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article seeks to provide one of the first systematic comparative analyses of                 labor market consequences associated with fields of study. Using data of 22                 countries from the European Labor Force Surveys (2004 and 2005), we analyze how                 field of study affects unemployment and occupational status for university-educated                 graduates. Our core hypothesis is that relative differences between fields should                 increase with educational expansion at the university level. Results of multilevel                 two-step regressions generally confirm our expectations. The more students graduate                 from universities, the greater the differences in labor market chances of university                 graduates from different fields.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reimer, D., Noelke, C., Kucel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Labor Market Effects of Field of Study in Comparative Perspective: An Analysis of 22 European Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Gender Segregation in European Labour Markets]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explores the role of field of study in channelling tertiary graduates                 into gender-appropriate occupations and the extent to which this process varies                 across countries. Previous research has demonstrated that such cross-country                 differences can be attributed to the nature of the welfare regime. However, less                 attention has been devoted to the potential impact of educational institutions and                 labour market systems. Using the European Union Labour Force Survey 2004 for 17 EU                 Member States, results of the multilevel analysis reveal that cross-national                 variation in occupational gender segregation must be seen in the context of                 institutional variation in education and labour market systems. The representation                 of women in higher education and the labour force, the gender pay gap and the                 provision of childcare explain a significant proportion of cross-national variation                 in occupational segregation by gender.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smyth, E., Steinmetz, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Gender Segregation in European Labour Markets]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Flexible Work: A Comparison between Germany and the UK]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article, the relationship between study programs in higher education and the                 risk of holding a temporary contract is investigated in a comparative perspective.                 We find that the effects fields of study have on the type of contract can be better                 explained by their link to occupational positions than by field specificity                 differentials. Furthermore, fields of study are more important in explaining the                 individual risk of holding a temporary contract in the German rather than in the UK                 labor market. This may be attributable to the higher degree of standardization of                 the German educational system.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giesecke, J., Schindler, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Flexible Work: A Comparison between Germany and the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do Fields of Study Matter for Over-education?: The Cases of Spain and Germany]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Resorting to European Labor Force Survey 2003&mdash;2005 data and controlling for factors traditionally accounting for over-education, we demonstrate here that fields of study influence the odds of being overeducated in Spain and in Germany. Being more stratified than the Spanish system of education, the German one uses fields of study as a signaling device for the labor market to a lesser extent than Spanish one. Cross-country similarities in terms of the relative position of fields of study within the country are discussed. Two samples have been researched: a general sample with information about individuals' fields of study as well as a restricted sample with additional information individuals' parental ISEI score, when such information was available. Heckman selection modeling has been applied to the latter (restricted) sample. A new technique has been devised to measure over-education, relying on ISCED categories instead of years of education.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortiz, L., Kucel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do Fields of Study Matter for Over-education?: The Cases of Spain and Germany]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>327</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/329?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Students' Workload in Higher Education: Ireland and Austria in Comparative Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/329?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a growing recognition of the importance of `field of study' in social research. However, few of the existing studies explore the extent to which different fields of study facilitate or constrain opportunities to engage in employment and students' perceptions of their work load in higher education. This article aims to explore the workload of higher education students across different fields of study in comparative perspective. Contrasting Ireland and Austria enables us to explore the way in which the institutional context influences student workload. Analyses of the survey data were conducted to explore the extent to which field of study influenced time spent at formal classes, on personal study and in term-time employment. Regression models were used to estimate the effect of field of study, controlling for a number of factors, including higher education institution, personal characteristics and other potential constraints on student time. Finally, we analyse the effect of student workload on overall satisfaction levels.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darmody, M., Smyth, E., Unger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Field of Study and Students' Workload in Higher Education: Ireland and Austria in Comparative Perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>346</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>329</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of Social Inequalities in Access to Higher Education in France and Germany]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explores social selectivity in access to tertiary education in France and Germany in the period from 1980 to 2000. Results of multinomial logistic regression models show that access to different postsecondary institutions is characterized by marked social background effects in both countries. Depending on the type of tertiary institution we consider in France or Germany, social selectivity into fields of study is also observed. Overall, there is no indication for substantial changes in the pattern of inequality in access to tertiary education in either country during the past two decades.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duru-Bellat, M., Kieffer, A., Reimer, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns of Social Inequalities in Access to Higher Education in France and Germany]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>368</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Educational Fields of Study and the Intergenerational Mobility Process in Comparative Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/4-5/369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines the importance of educational field of study, in addition to educational level, for explaining intergenerational class mobility in four countries: France, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands. Starting from standard models that only include educational level, we increase the complexity of the educational measure by differentiating between fields of study within levels. Contrary to our expectations, including field of study does not substantially reduce the partial effect of class origin on class destination. This seems to be due to the limited association between class origin and field choice, and between field choice and class destination. Implications for stratification and mobility studies are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, M., Luijkx, R., Pollak, R., Vallet, L.-A., van de Werfhorst, H. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208093082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Educational Fields of Study and the Intergenerational Mobility Process in Comparative Perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4-5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>388</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/2-3/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on Acculturation and Adjustment of Immigrants and Societal Response: Multicultural Perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/49/2-3/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishman, G., Mesch, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208088905</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on Acculturation and Adjustment of Immigrants and Societal Response: Multicultural Perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Prediction of Delinquency among Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Youth: Unwrapping the Package of Culture]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Using a cross-sectional data set of 837 male adolescents (346 local Germans, 375                 ethnic German immigrants from the countries of the Former Soviet Union (average                 length of residence = 7.6 years), 52 first-generation (= foreign born, average                 length of residence = 9.2 years) and 64 second-generation immigrants (= born in                 Germany) from other origins such as Turkey, Former Yugoslavia or Afghanistan) aged                 15.4 years, this article brings together acculturation research with research on                 behavior problems in non-immigrant youth. Male immigrants reported higher numbers of                 delinquent acts pursued in the last 12 months than local boys. First-generation                 immigrants from mostly Muslim backgrounds show the highest amount of problem                 behavior. In spite of these differences, comparisons of structural equation models                 show that the prediction of delinquency is about the same (delinquent beliefs and                 friends, clique membership, parental monitoring, and language problems) for all four                 groups. Applying stepwise regression analyses, most of the culture-related variance                 in boys' delinquency is explained by the same set of predictors with delinquent                 beliefs and parental violence being the most powerful markers for the differences                 between the groups. The discussion sheds light on the living situation of immigrant                 youth in Germany and why delinquent beliefs may be of central importance to                 understanding the differences between local and immigrant youth.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208088906</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Prediction of Delinquency among Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Youth: Unwrapping the Package of Culture]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Identity, Identity Formation, and Delinquency]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of this study has been to gain knowledge about the shaping of social identity among immigrants and the effect of that identity on delinquent behavior. The data are based on a longitudinal study conducted in Israel on 773 immigrant youths from the Former Soviet Union (FSU) who participated in the study for three years. Results from logistic regressions suggest that different models can explain different strategies of identity formation. Regarding delinquent behavior, the assimilation strategy of identity change increases the likelihood of delinquent behavior, but the impact of the assimilation is challenged by the effect of the proportion of the immigrants' Israeli friends. The discussion introduces the concept of subjective and objective assimilation as a possible explanation for the contradictory findings.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turjeman, H., Mesch, G., Fishman, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207088907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Identity, Identity Formation, and Delinquency]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Higher Education Entry of Turkish Immigrant Youth in Germany]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on three large datasets from the German Higher Education Information System                 Institute (HIS) from 1990, 1994 and 1999, the study reveals that Turkish youth are                 considerably more likely than Germans to enter tertiary education. This result                 sharply contrasts with findings on the Turks' poor performance in primary and                 secondary school. The higher propensity for tertiary education among Turks can, to                 some degree, be explained by their lack of familiarity with the German system of                 dual vocational training and their educational motivation. Another important finding                 is that among those who enter higher education students of Turkish origin choose,                 more often than Germans, academically oriented universities rather than the                 lower-tier applied science universities. This is mainly due to the selection of more                 traditional fields offered at universities by Turkish young adults. Our results                 indicate that the educational decisions of these students after the <I>Abitur</I>                 by no means contribute to the established pattern of ethnic disadvantages in                 educational attainment in Germany.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristen, C., Reimer, D., Kogan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208088909</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Higher Education Entry of Turkish Immigrant Youth in Germany]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regional Differences Matter: Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant                 Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this study, we examine which role the size of the immigrant population plays in                 explaining immigrant derogation within and between European regions. We draw upon                 group threat- and intergroup contact theory to consider the following question: does                 a larger size of immigrant population increase perceived group threat and thereby                 lead to greater immigrant derogation? Or does it increase intergroup contact and                 thereby ameliorate immigrant derogation? We test the empirical adequacy of these                 alternative suggestions using regionalized European Social Survey 2002 and official                 data which will be analyzed by means of multilevel structural equation modeling.                 Within regions, our results confirm that perceived group threat increases subsequent                 immigrant derogation. Likewise, intergroup contact reduces perceived group threat                 and thereby amends such derogation of immigrants. Between regions, our findings show                 that a larger size of the immigrant population increases both greater perceived                 group threat and intergroup contact. At the same time, the effects of perceived                 group threat and intergroup contact on immigrant derogation resemble those found                 within regions. In sum, these results lend evidence to the generalizability of both                 group threat- and contact effects. Implications of these findings for future                 research are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlueter, E., Wagner, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020815207088910</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regional Differences Matter: Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant                 Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for Repatriation Policies of Migrants: Comparisons Across and Explanations for European Countries]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we focus on the acceptance of migrants among the general public in                 the receiving societies. We analyze the most radical of such anti-immigrant                 sentiments, that is, the support for repatriation policies for legally established                 immigrants. We analyze intra- and international differences among Western and                 Eastern European societies, taking advantage of recently collected cross-national                 high quality data providing means to rigorously test hypotheses on individual and                 contextual level determinants. Although there are large differences between                 countries within European regions, we found that support for repatriation policies                 is overall somewhat higher in Western European societies. In line with Ethnic Group                 Conflict Theory, support for repatriation policies is stronger in countries with                 higher proportions of resident migrants and higher levels of immigration. Regarding                 individual level determinants, we found that particularly lower educated individuals                 are more in favor of repatriation of migrants. The effect of education differs                 however across countries and is &mdash; in line with socialization theories                 &mdash; less strong in Eastern European countries.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coenders, M., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208088911</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for Repatriation Policies of Migrants: Comparisons Across and Explanations for European Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>194</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Does a Nation Owe Non-Citizens?: National Attachments, Perception of Threat and Attitudes towards Granting                 Citizenship Rights in a Comparative Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/2-3/195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we test the effects of national attachments (patriotism and                 chauvinism) and perception of threat on citizens' willingness to concede citizenship                 rights to immigrants in France, Germany (West and East), the USA and Israel. Our                 findings show that despite marked differences in countries' migration policies and                 conceptions of nationhood, no significant differences were found in attitudes                 towards the allocation of citizenship rights to immigrants. Furthermore, our                 analysis suggests that contrary to our expectations, 1) the effects of both                 chauvinism and patriotism on willingness to grant citizenship rights to immigrants                 were rather low in Germany and Israel &mdash; the two ethno-national states,                 and strongest in France and the USA &mdash; which stand for republican and                 multicultural models of incorporation, respectively; 2) the effects of threat on                 exclusion of immigrants from citizenship rights was weaker in Israel (ethnic                 democracy) but stronger in the liberal democratic countries. In the conclusion, we                 suggest possible explanations for these rather intriguing and paradoxical             findings.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raijman, R., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Hochman, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715208088912</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Does a Nation Owe Non-Citizens?: National Attachments, Perception of Threat and Attitudes towards Granting                 Citizenship Rights in a Comparative Perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foreigners' Impact on European Societies: Public Views and Perceptions in a Cross-National Comparative Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The research examines the extent to which attitudes toward foreigners vary across European countries. Using data from the European Social Survey for 21 countries the analysis reveals that foreigners' impact on society is viewed in most countries in negative rather in positive terms. The negative views are most pronounced with regard to foreigners' impact on crime and least pronounced with regard to foreigners' impact on culture. Multi-level regression analysis demonstrates that the negative views tend to be more pronounced among individuals who are socially and economically vulnerable and among individuals who hold conservative political ideologies. The analysis also reveals that negative attitudes toward foreigners tend to be more pronounced in countries characterized by large proportions of foreigners, where economic conditions are less prosperous, and where support for right-wing political parties is more prevalent. The analysis shows that inflated perception of the size of the foreign population is likely to increase negative views toward foreigners and to mediate the relations between actual size and attitudes toward foreigners' impact on society. The findings are presented and discussed in light of sociological theories on individuals and structural sources of public attitudes toward out-group populations and on the role of perceptions in shaping such attitudes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., Gorodzeisky, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207088585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foreigners' Impact on European Societies: Public Views and Perceptions in a Cross-National Comparative Perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>29</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/31?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transition from Educational System to Labour Market in the European Union: A Comparison between New and Old Members]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/31?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Theoretically, the central research question of this article pertains to the way in                 which national institutional arrangements, namely educational systems, and related                 modes of labour markets and welfare provisions, affect the aggregate effectiveness                 of youth labour market integration in the new EU member states in comparison to the                 old EU countries. The study utilizes the European Union Labour Force Survey 2004.                 Results of the cluster analysis provide substantial support for distinct patterns of                 labour market entry in terms of the stratification of labour market exclusion,                 downgrading risk and labour market mobility of LM entrants in different CEE                 countries. Furthermore, the article reveals also new aspects of labour market entry                 in the EU-15 countries while considering not only educational signalling but also                 the labour market flexibility dimension.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saar, E., Unt, M., Kogan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207088586</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transition from Educational System to Labour Market in the European Union: A Comparison between New and Old Members]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/60?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Index of Pro-Woman Nation-States: A Comparative Analysis of 39 Countries]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/49/1/60?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pro-woman nation-states need to be identified because these states may help diminish traditional gender roles and gender stratification by providing structural opportunities for women (Wang, 2004; Wernet et al., 2005). Comparative, country-level data on multiple domains, such as female life expectancy, low fertility rates, education levels, the legal status of abortion, the percent of women in public life, female labor force participation, and family leave policies, are gathered from the Population Reference Bureau (1998) and the International Labor Organization (1997). This article explores the differential access that people in 39 countries have to the aforementioned rights and privileges in order to identify which countries have policies that are the most beneficial for women by ranking pro-woman nation-states in a comparative index.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wernet, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207088587</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Index of Pro-Woman Nation-States: A Comparative Analysis of 39 Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Work Family Time Squeeze: Conflicting Demands of Paid and Unpaid Work among Working Couples in 29 Countries]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article analyzes work&mdash;family balance among working couples in 29                 countries using data from ISSP 2002. Arguments derived from theories on family                 regimes and modernization are tested. The results indicate that respondents can be                 categorized into three clusters. The first comprises those having a                 work&mdash;family balance; the second, those having an occupational                 work-overload; and the third, those having a dual work-overload (i.e. those                 experiencing too strong demands from both work and family responsibilities). Across                 countries, cluster sizes vary tremendously. The results indicate that the wealth of                 a country is strongly associated with the likelihood of achieving a balanced                 work&mdash;family situation. Although the overall probability increases with                 economic wealth, the relative disadvantage for women compared to men persists. The                 female disadvantage is mainly a higher risk of occupational overload in the rich                 countries, whereas in poorer countries there is a higher risk of being in a dual                 work-overload situation. Among the wealthy industrialized democracies, a balanced                 work&mdash;family situation is more common in the familialist German-linguistic                 country grouping, followed by the Nordic countries characterized by                 de-familialization. Market-oriented countries perform less well. Within the                 perspective of the theory on family regimes, the similarity between the familialist                 and the de-familialist regimes is an unexpected result.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edlund, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207083338</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Work Family Time Squeeze: Conflicting Demands of Paid and Unpaid Work among Working Couples in 29 Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>48</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>480</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/481?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Employment Insecurity at Labour Market Entry and Its Impact on Parental Home Leaving and Family Formation: A Comparative Study among Recent Graduates in Eight European Countries]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/481?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explores whether employment insecurity (i.e. unemployment and flexible employment) at labour market entry has a negative impact on parental home leaving and family formation. To answer this question, data from a large-scale European graduate survey carried out in 1998 were analysed. The results show that graduates with an insecure employment status at labour market entry are indeed less likely to leave the parental home and establish a nuclear household and family than those with stable first employment. With regard to entry into marriage and parenthood, these results especially hold true for men. Furthermore, it is found that in European countries in which unemployment among tertiary education graduates is high, the likelihood of leaving the parental home and starting a nuclear household and family is smaller than in European countries where such unemployment is low.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolbers, M. H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207083339</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Employment Insecurity at Labour Market Entry and Its Impact on Parental Home Leaving and Family Formation: A Comparative Study among Recent Graduates in Eight European Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>48</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>507</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>481</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speaking of Globalization: Frame Analysis and the World Society]]></title>
<link>http://cos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/48/6/509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article introduces the concept of <I>global frames</I> as a means of measuring the degree to which individuals reference transnationalism in their interpretations of various events. Over the past few decades, institutional actors within world society have incorporated a language of globality into the public discourse, and this article examines whether this trend has become visible at the micro-level. The utility of this concept is illustrated using coded newspaper editorials from Canada and the United States in 2001 and 2003. Nearly one-fifth of the sampled editorials used a global frame, meaning that individuals do adopt the rhetoric established in the public sphere. Editorials that discussed either the US-Iraq Conflict or events that involved multiple countries were significantly more likely to use a global frame. In addition, US editorials used global frames at a higher rate than Canadian editorials. Thus, global framing is patterned by both shifts in public discourse and the persistent relevance of national borders.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Essary, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0020715207083341</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speaking of Globalization: Frame Analysis and the World Society]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>48</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>